写读后感是一个让我们锻炼语言表达能力的好机会，应该认真对待，养成写读后感的习惯可以让我们的表达能力得到提高，以下是职场巴巴小编精心为您推荐的《情人》的读后感7篇，供大家参考。
《情人》的读后感篇1
?儿子与情人》是英国作家劳伦斯的第一部长篇小说。小说中的父亲莫雷尔是一名矿工，遇到其妻子两人相爱并结婚，但婚后不久，由于长期的沉重劳动和煤井事故使他脾气暴躁，夫妇两人经常发生争吵，慢慢发觉原来两人之间的爱情只是昙花一现。母亲开始将自己的全部感情都放在自己的孩子身上。
一开始，母亲最看好长子威廉，希望他能出人头地，但是威廉在去伦敦当律师的时候过度劳累致死。大儿子去世后，莫雷尔太太则把全部希望寄予在小儿子保罗身上。围绕着保罗的除了母爱，还有和米莉安、克拉拉的爱情，在恋爱的过程中，保罗因一直爱着自己的母亲而无法真正地爱上其他女人。他和米莉安兴趣相投、渐渐擦出火花，然而米莉安想在精神上占据保罗使他喘不过气，莫雷尔太太也对她没有好感，保罗进退两难，最终放弃了米莉安。和米莉安分手后，保罗又与克拉拉相恋，但两人之间的爱情不是灵魂的结合，只是肉体上的狂欢，短暂的激情过后注定要破灭。
母亲在保罗的身上倾注了太多母爱以至于这种感情变得畸形，一定程度上也在摧毁保罗，在母亲的影响下，保罗无法做出自己选择、走自己的道路，一直到母亲去世，他才挣脱束缚，真正长大。
小说除了描写这一畸形的感情，还批判了英国工业社会中的物质文明，强调人应坚持原始的本性。
《情人》的读后感篇2
eading report of sons and lovers during my extracurricular time, i started reading sons and lovers, which was written by david herbert lawrence. he was an english novelist, poet, playwright, essayist, literary critic and painter who published as d. h. lawrence. he was born on september 11, 1885 to a miner and his wife in the small village of eastwood near nottingham, england. arthur and lydia lawrence, his parents, had a troublesome marriage from the start: his father, a miner, was content to stay on the mining grounds while his mother yearned to leave. so his childhood was dominated by poverty and friction between his parents. he was educated at nottingham high school, and won a scholarship. he worked as a clerk in a surgical appliance factory, and then for four years as a pupil-teacher. he was died in vence, france on march 2, 1930. lawrence is now valued by many as a visionary thinker and significant representative of modernism in english literature. there is a background before the author wrote this book. lawrence lived at a time when the industrial revolution was taking on the whole world, especially in great britain, which changed from agricultural society towards industrial society. and it brought all changes in national and personal lives. lawrence?s novel sons and lovers deals with lawrence?s personal experiences in the working-class environment in nottinghamshire.
sons and lovers is the third published novel of d. h. lawrence, taken by many to be his earliest masterpiece. it tells the story of paul morel, a young man and a budding artist. this autobiographical novel is a brilliant evocation of life in a working class mining community. this novel is about the life of movels. mr.morel, mrs.moel, paul, miriam and clara are the main characters in this novel. the author develops the story by portraying the relationships between these characters. but the end of the relationship is a tragedy. i divided this book into two parts. now i will introduce the first part of this book.
the refined daughter of a good old burgher family, gertrude coppard meets a rough-hewn miner at a christmas dance and falls into a whirlwind romance. but soon after her marriage to walter morel, she realizes the difficulties of living off his meager salary in a rented house. the couple fight and drift apart and walter retreats to the pub after work each day. gradually, mrs.morel?s
affections shift to her sons, beginning with the oldest, william. as a boy, william is so attached to his mother that he doesn?t enjoy the fair without her. as he grows older, he defends her against his father?s occasional violence. eventually, he leaves home for a job in london, where he begins to rise up into the middle class. he is engaged, but he detests the girl?s superficiality. he dies, and mrs. morel is heartbroken, but when william catches pneumonia, she rediscovers her love for her second son. both repulsed by and drawn to his mother, paul is afraid to leave her but wants to go out on his own, and needs to experience love. gradually, he falls into a relation ship with miriam, a farm girl who attends his church. the two take long walks and have intellectual conversations about books, but resists in, in part because his mother looks down on her.
i want to introduce the three characters of this book: mr. morel, mrs morel and miriam leviers. mr. morel is paul's rough, sensual, hard-drinking father. in many ways, he is his wife's opposite. mr. morel is from a lower-class mining family. he speaks the local dialect in contrast to his wife's refined english. he loves to drink and dance practices that mrs. morel, a strict congregationalist, considers sinful. mrs morel is one of the most formidable mothers in all of western literature. to the narrator, and perhaps to paul morel, she is both a giving, selfless nurturer of her children and a possessive tyrant. miriam leviers, paul's teenage friend and sweetheart, was modeled after lawrence's own young love, miriam is paul's devoted helpmate in his artistic and spiritual quests. although beautiful, she takes no pleasure in her physical attributes. her whole life is geared towards heaven and a mystical sense of nature.
this is the most autobiographical of all lawrence?s works as the author himself had a similar relationship with his own mother. the use of this oedipal theme is one of a number of freudian concepts he used throughout his books. like many of his works, sons and lovers was criticized when first published for obscenity and one publisher called it the dirtiest book he had ever read, but compared to his later works it is quite constrained.
there are three females that paul had loved. the first person is his mother. paul is afraid to leave her but wants to go out on his own, and experience love. then, it is miriam, whom is a farm girl. they have intellectual conversations about books in the nature. at last, paul meets clara dawes, who has separated
from her husband, paul get physical satisfaction from her.
i want to show my opinions about the love between paul and miriam.miriam leviers, paul's teenage friend and sweetheart, was modeled after lawrence's own young love. she is romantic in her soul but timid and sensitive in appearance. miriam is paul's devoted helpmate in his artistic and spiritual quests. although beautiful, she takes no pleasure in her physical attributes. her whole life is geared towards heaven and a mystical sense of nature. miriam is paul?s first lover. miriam loves paul, but she can?t admit to and has no courage to love. when she loves paul, she only wants to dominate his mind, then to catch paul?s whole soul. but paul knows that miriam only loves his soul and wants to posses him. in this book, there is a dialogue between them which paul rejected miriam. miriam said: you had said that we belong to each other. i was young. i did belong to my mother and now she is died. i don?t want to live again with you, not even with you. i?m sure i?ll never find one as good as you, but perhaps i understand at last what the mean to live, said paul. for paul, mother?s love makes him unhappy, while miriam seems like his mother as both want to control his soul. of course, he will against that form of love as he thinks that?s not love and wants to escape from this spiritual love. i think the love was failed because of miriam?s possession.
then, i?d like to compare lawrence as a combination of both william and paul. as william, he was a man who grew in such family and had a strong will to break the shackles of his class. william was gifted, he was successful in both his academy work and interpersonal relational, and he escaped from his lamentable family to london. the mentality of william just like lawrence purred his feel to this character subconsciously: the disgust of his father, admiration of mother, struggle to free himself from the mournful family. all these characteristics are based on author himself experience. of course, these stuffs also connected with the society at that time, which class you came from can be the first to affect who you were or how you were, in order to change your social status, the post important was to change the class you belonged to. all these ideology created both lawrence and his william.
at the moment, it?s clear that paul?s oedipus complex and reasons. actually paul has not become a normal adult by getting over some problems like
other children. that is not only determined by his mother?s abnormal maternity. the reasons are in many ways, some comes from the parents; some comes from his sisters and brothers, some even from the society, the mechanical civilization, which leads to the family tragedy and distortion of personality.
《情人》的读后感篇3
很久没有在两天内看完一本书，实在是因为我读的别的书太长太拗口要读明白太费时，实在是因为这本书太通俗易懂，实在是因为这书太吸引人，人们曾说她的书非常难以理解，她那种写法很独特也很让人感到莫名其妙，我却没有这种感觉，没有这种感觉的，我断定，还大有其人。
今天一口气读完了，我在书的末尾页写下：用一个文字结识另一个生僻的文字，用一个灵魂唤醒另一个沉睡的灵魂。
这本书畅销了几百万册，她也因《情人》这部小说闻名于世，现在的用语叫走红。不过，众所周知，她的个人生活远比小说更富传奇色彩也更为精彩。
一打开这本小说，我就真切地感受到杜拉斯其人她是一个那么真诚的人，我一直觉得，唯饱含深情的人可以打动他的人类同胞。
我喜欢这类的女人，她们活得真实，我喜欢去伪存真的.人，像杜拉斯，她爱讲真话，我喜欢这种讲真话讲得那么好的人，我也喜欢活得那么生动和忠于自我的人，不是每一个人都敢，在这里，我倒觉得该感谢她的原生家庭，尽管它糟得不能再糟，可是就是那样的家庭里才能诞生这样一个奇特的有个性的追求真善美同时追求孤独和痛苦的女子，像我，我就不敢说，我甚至不敢写。她写得那么好，语言那么简练，可是却那么发人深省，可是却那么赤裸裸地揭露人性最阴暗或者最脆弱或者最真实的一面，写得那么淋漓尽致，写得那么没有一丝丝做作，色而不淫，这一部惊世之作。
我读的是王道乾翻译的版本。很好。
我一直在做梦，从不停止做这样的梦，有一天我会以写作为生，有一天我可以不再做自己讨厌的工作，有一天我可以靠着我头脑里这些数不清的句子和片段而支撑我的生活，我的笔我的书可以让我生活到老，一直到死。要是能养活我的两个孩子直到他们长大成人，也未尝不可。
“她是反对的，她认为写作没有什么价值，不是工作，她认为那是胡扯淡——她后来对我说，那是一种小孩子的想法。”
没错 ，读到这里，我觉得我真是太幸运了，这世上还有我的知音存在呢，很多时候我都能引起共鸣。
或许因为，从某种角度看，我的父亲跟杜拉斯的母亲有某种相似之处，他们扮演着一样的角色，我父亲对我喜欢写作的态度，跟杜拉斯母亲对她的那种，如出一辙。
我三十岁了，可我却不敢让父母知道我读的这本书的书名。
还有，我至今没有勇气写我的三十年。我至今还浅尝辄止地写着假惺惺要靠虚构而创作的小说，我为自己不能说真话而痛苦。这种痛苦来源于我懦弱的性格，而这种性格也是原生家庭造成的。
不过，这不妨碍我幸福，是的，我生活得很幸福，我比她幸运，但是也不幸。
我羡慕杜拉斯的大胆，她敢写，她什么都敢，尽管她也有恐惧，她不敢告诉母亲和大哥哥，她也不敢说那些事，但是她敢做。
“这一点我那时（十五岁半）已经对我母亲讲了：我想做的就是这个，写文章，写作。第一次没有反应，不回答。后来她问：写什么？我说写几本书，写小说。她冷冷地说：数学教师资格会考考过以后，你愿意，你就去写，那我就不管了。”
我读着她的这些话，仿佛写的是我，仿佛她那母亲的角色正是由我父亲扮演。我父亲说，只要你不放弃你的教职，怎么样都可以，你看，是不是跟杜拉斯的母亲一样，他得确保我不放弃体制内的工作，确保我能赖以生存下去，我内心里并不反感，因为我彻底的做了一只温水煮着泡着的青蛙。我并不特别痛苦，眼前这份工作除了不是我最热爱的，除了不能让我在旅游淡季出行，其他什么都好。
毕竟，它也并不耽误我写作。
《情人》的读后感篇4
今天我阅读了《意外的情人节》这本书，书中讲述了这样一个故事：课间休息的时候，小熊妹妹和它的伙伴们正在跳绳。忽然，小熊妹妹最讨厌的比利走了过来，它跟小熊妹妹一起跳绳，比利不小心被绳子绊倒了，几个人摔做了一团。小熊妹妹正想去追比利，突然，上课铃响了，大家都回到了各自的教室。珍妮老师说：“同学们，情人节就要到了，我们要举办一场情人节派对，大家要互相赠送情人节贺卡。”“太棒了！”全班同学都欢呼了起来。小熊妹妹想：“我该给最讨厌的比利送什么样的贺卡呢？
等回到了家，小熊妹妹想：“我该给比利的贺卡上写什么？是玫瑰花是红色的，紫罗兰是蓝色的。你这样的大傻瓜是没人要的。还是水仙是黄色的，玫瑰是红色的。脑子进了水，我也不会要你的。”“你在想什么？”熊妈妈问。小熊妹妹说：“我只是在想要送什么样的情人节贺卡给比利。”熊妈妈问：“比利是你的朋友吗？”小熊妹妹说：“不是朋友，我跟他有仇。”小熊妹妹开始做贺卡了，它在贺卡上写：怪物可以是奇形怪状的。但要说最吓人的，那就非你莫属了。猜猜我是谁？
然而，当比利打开贺卡时，小熊妹妹却忘了看，因为在它收到的贺卡当中，有一张让它惊他不已，那张贺卡上挂满了爱心和鲜花，上面还写着：你愿意跟我做朋友吗？这时，比利走了过来，它说：“小熊妹妹，这是我攒了几个星期的零花钱给你买的贺卡。”小熊妹妹很惊讶，不知道该说什么，只说了一声“谢谢”。第二天学校开会，它们两个坐在了一起。
读了这个故事我学到了人虽然有坏处，但是也要看别人的好处，就像小熊妹妹和比利一样，比利最后不是变好了吗？
《情人》的读后感篇5
我已经老了，有一天，在一处公共场所的大厅里，有一个男人向我走来。他主动介绍自己，他对我说：“我认识你，永远记得你。那时候，你还很年轻，人人都说你美，现在，我是特意来告诉你，对我来说，我觉得现在你比年轻的时候更美，那时你是年轻女人，与你那时的面貌相比，我更爱你现在备受摧残的面容。”
就是这段《情人》的开头描写，让人忍不住一窥究竟。杜拉斯最出名的小说，电影由梁家辉主演。一直想看，但一直拖延没看，这次读书小组里开始阅读这本书，一开始，我是欣喜的。可是才看下去，我就开始崩溃了，这是什么玩意！看得很吃力，人称的随意更换，时间线各种错乱，零零碎碎的句子描写，各种大长句，真的让人看得崩溃，而且很失望。才看了百分之七就放下了，今天到截止时间，要交读书笔记了，我才耐着性子继续看下去。
直到半小时前这本书看了百分之八十，我都是厌烦了。可是最后的一章，我居然开始能跟随小说了。前文不断描写的各种回忆，无能母亲，暴力的大哥，懦弱的小哥哥，这些角色的描述和回忆都非常多。对于真正的情人，那个中国男人却描述很少。可是最后一章，他们分别之时的场景描写，却让我心醉。
这本书这么出名，真的是有道理的。读完之后的感受一时无法形容，让人惊叹于作者的文笔。那种无力、绝望、悲戚之感扑面而来。突然你就原谅了前文的种种混乱的回忆描写。直到分离，她才知道，她是爱他的。可是，一切已成定局，不是么。最后的那个电话，那时她已老去，他却还爱着她。他根本不能不爱她，他说他爱她将一直爱到他死。这时你再回想起那些散乱的回忆，你却好像融入到她的爱情，她的一生之中。
《情人》的读后感篇6
说实话，这本书的前半部分我并不看好，被冗长繁杂的文字和时间模糊的跨度折磨的丧失信心，我甚至怀疑过这本书的水准。但是反复的劝慰自己，它肯定有它的独到之处，否则也不会有如此高的成就。于是我重新整理思绪，再次进入到角色里面。才发觉，作者之所以长篇累牍的叙述家庭琐事和社会背景，是为了迎合她的内心感受，她想让读者们知道，她所有的爱恨情仇，都是基于她的生活背景。如果认识原来的我，就会原谅现在的我。
最令人感慨的就是男女主人公之间深沉而无望的爱情，在那样的年代，他们的结合是错误的。但是，对于他们自身而言，是无比幸福而快乐的。然而，故事最终仍旧是个悲剧。世界上最遥远的距离莫过于，两个人明明相爱却不能在一起。那是怎样的一种时间和空间的惆怅和折磨呢?
这本书最精彩的地方是后半部分，作者的笔锋愈加凝练，一段段色彩凝重的自然风景把故事渲染的美丽而绝望。而男女主人公无时无刻不在承受离别的撕心裂肺和伤心欲绝。爱，不能光明正大的爱;恨，只能压制的心底。看着揪心，摸着疼，真是无尽沧桑尽在其中啊。
“我已经老了，有一天，在一处公共场所的大厅里，有一个男人向我走来。他主动介绍自己，他对我说：‘我认识你，永远记得你。那时候，你还很年轻，人人都说你妹，现在，我是特为来告诉你，对我来说，我觉得你比年轻的时候更美，那时你是年轻女人，与你那时的面貌相比，我更爱你现在备受摧残的面容。’我常常忆起这个只有我自己还能回想起而从未向别人谈及的形象。它一直在那里，在那昔日的寂静之中，令我赞叹不止。这是所有形象中最使我惬意，也是我最熟悉、最为之心荡神驰的一个形象。”
《情人》的读后感篇7
d.h.lawrence and his sons and lovers sons and lovers was regarded as his autobiography, actually, i strongly agree with this view. isquo;d like to compare the novel with lawrence in the following three aspects: family background, the shackle of class and oedipus complex. first is the background. as to d.h.lawrence, he was born in a family which his father was a miner who hardly received any education, instead of his mother with well education and her personal ideal of the politics or philosophy. compared with sons and lovers, the herosquo;s family is similar with lawrencesquo;s-----vulgar father, well-educated mother. the father who works as a miner, nothing like to do but drinking, his words usually can be rude no matter what to his wife or his children;
the mother, a well educated lady, fell in love with mr. morels accidently, but the reality finally defeated her romance, the humble and mediocre life struck her dream of being honorable. all in all, these situations are reflection of lawrencesquo;s life, not only the characteristics of parents but also the surroundings, like working in the mine, living a strapped life and so on. secondly, to a certain degree, isquo;d like to compare lawrence as a combination of both william and paul (the eldest son and younger son in the novel). as william, he was a man who grew in such family and had a strong will to break the shackles of his class. william was gifted, he was successful in both his academy work and interpersonal relationship, and he escaped from his lamentable family to london. the mentality of william just like lawrencesquo;s that a canary in the cage who tried to get away to the broad sky. so in this aspect, i think lawrence purred his feel to this character subconsciously: the disgust of his father, admiration of his mother, struggle to free himself from the mournful family. all these characteristics are based on author himself experience. of course, these stuffs also connected with the society at that time, which class you came from can be the first to affect who you were or how you were, in order to change your social status, the most important was to change the class you belonged to. all these ideology created both lawrence and his william. last but not the least i want to point out is oedipus complex which showing explicitly in the novel, peculiarly on paul, the younger son who faced the difficulty when his love countered to miss miriam, the deeply love towards his mother----mrs. morel, which was clanged his tightly. he can find his true love until one he emancipated himself from his mothersquo;s love. paul would be entangled with dilemma every time when he stayed with miriam;
he could not love her from heart as his will and another hand, he cansquo;t abandon his love to his mother. as a generally thought, mrs. morel was regarded as lawrencesquo;s mother----lydia, miss miriam was recognized as lawrencesquo;s first girlfriend----jessie. in this point, lawrence endowed his oedipus complex on his paul, in the novel, the agonized and miserable love was showed incisively and vividly. from all above, we can see distinctly, the novel----- sons and lovers is an autobiography of lawrence himself, not only on the background of the society, family, but also the personality of the leading character. from the novel, we can have a glimpse of lawrencesquo;s private life;
a talent suffered from his anguished and miserable love, and shackle of class.
会计实习心得体会最新模板相关文章：
